🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to talk to Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the archives is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month represents how little it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.